{rfName}
¿

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Citations

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Guinda C.s.Author

Share

Publications
>
Article

¿Idiolectos o tecnolectos? Resquicios de impronta personal en la descripción de procedimientos técnicos

Publicated to:Circulo De Linguistica Aplicada A La Comunicacion. 2023 (93): 17-37 - 2023-01-01 2023(93), DOI: 10.5209/clac.85563

Authors: Guinda, CS

Affiliations

Univ Politecn Madrid, Madrid, Spain - Author
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid - Author

Abstract

¿Qué margen queda para la impronta personal en un texto tan constreñido y escueto como es la descripción de un procedimiento estándar en ingeniería? Este artículo examina las estrategias de los estudiantes de cuarto curso de Ingeniería Aeronáutica y del Espacio de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid para construir su propio ethos académico y comunicar una impresión de credibilidad y confianza. El escrutinio de un corpus electrónico de más de 300 muestras de autoría individual y 76 de escritura colaborativa, todas ellas redactadas en lengua inglesa y en el marco de la asignatura obligatoria English for Professional and Academic Communication, revela que estos escritores inexpertos se posicionan en cuanto al mensaje y a su audiencia trasgrediendo convenciones formales, recurriendo a expresiones de subjetividad (mitigadores, enfatizadores y marcadores de actitud), adoptando un mayor o menor grado de deferencia metadiscursiva hacia el lector y graduando las distancias espaciotemporal y modal.

Keywords

academic and professional writingethosgenreprocedural descriptionvoiceAcademic and professional writingEthosInstruction manualsPositioningProcedural descriptionVoice

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Circulo De Linguistica Aplicada A La Comunicacion due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2023, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Linguistics and Language.

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-20:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 2 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Additionally, the work has been submitted to a journal classified as Diamond in relation to this type of editorial policy.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (SANCHO GUINDA, CARMEN) and Last Author (SANCHO GUINDA, CARMEN).