{rfName}
Ar

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

Altmetrics

Grant support

This work forms part of a research project (1.011.008) funded by the Alfonso X el Sabio University Foundation.

Analysis of institutional authors

Hontoria-Galan, MonicaAuthor

Share

March 13, 2025
Publications
>
Article
No

Are Perceived Effort Scales (OMNI-RES) Appropriate for Defining and Controlling Strength Training Intensity?

Publicated to:Sports (Basel). 13 (2): 57- - 2025-02-01 13(2), DOI: 10.3390/sports13020057

Authors: Mate-Munoz, Jose Luis; Maicas-Perez, Luis; Aparicio-Garcia, Inigo; Hernandez-Lougedo, Juan; De Sousa-De Sousa, Luis; Hontoria-Galan, Monica; Hermosilla-Perona, Francisco; Barba-Ruiz, Manuel; Garcia-Fernandez, Pablo; Heredia-Elvar, Juan Ramon

Affiliations

Alfonso X El Sabio Univ, Dept Phys Act & Sports Sci, Madrid 28691, Spain - Author
Camilo Jose Cela Univ, HM Hosp, Fac Hlth Sci, Physiotherapy & Hlth Res Grp FYSA, Madrid 28692, Spain - Author
HM Hosp, Inst Invest Sanitaria, Madrid 28692, Spain - Author
Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Nursing Physiotherapy & Podiatry, Madrid 28040, Spain - Author
Univ Politecn Madrid UPM, Fac Phys Act & Sport Sci, Dept Sports, Sport & Training Res Grp, Madrid 28040, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Background: One of the most significant challenges for exercise professionals in designing strength training programs is determining the intensity or effort level of each set performed. One of the most studied methodologies has been the use of Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scales. This study aims to analyze the application of the OMNI-RES scale for monitoring training intensity across different relative loads and fatigue levels in various training protocols. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, participants completed nine exercise sessions, with one week separating each session. The first session involved a one-repetition maximum (1RM) test in the bench press (BP) to identify the load-velocity relationship. Subsequently, each participant randomly performed two maximum repetition (MNR) protocols at 60% and 90% of 1RM, and two protocols with a 30% velocity loss (VL) at 60% of 1RM and a 10% VL at 90% of 1RM. These sessions were repeated one week later. Results: significant differences were found between the four bench press protocols regarding the number of repetitions and the percentage of velocity loss per set (p < 0.001). However, the RPE of the MNR protocol at 60% of 1RM was significantly higher than the other protocols. Moreover, the RPE for the protocol at 60% of 1RM with a 30% VL was similar to that at 90% of 1RM with a 10% VL (p = 1.000). Post-exercise blood lactate concentrations, percentage VL at 1 ms(-1), and the effort index were significantly higher in the MNR protocol at 60% of 1RM compared to all other protocols (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The most important finding of this study is that the OMNI-RES scale may not be a reliable indicator of exercise intensity. This is because the highest values on the scale were observed at the lowest relative intensity (60% 1RM) during the maximum number of repetitions (MNR) protocol, corresponding to the maximum volume.

Keywords

Blood lactateConcurrent validationExertion scaleFatiguFatigueHeart-rateHuman performanceLoadLoading intensityMovement velocityPerformancePrograRepetitionsResistance exercise intensitySport performanceStatistical-methodsStrengthTrainingVelocity

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Sports (Basel) due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2025, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation.

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-08:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 6 (PlumX).