{rfName}
In

License and Use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Tarque, NicolaAuthor

Share

March 22, 2025
Publications
>
Article

Investigating Scale Effects on Experimental Shear Strength of Earthen Walls (Adobe and Rammed-Earth)

Publicated to: Buildings. 15 (5): 689- - 2025-03-01 15(5), DOI: 10.3390/buildings15050689

Authors:

Ruiz, DM; Reyes, JC; Alvarado, YA; Vacca, H; Tarque, N; Jerez, S
[+]

Affiliations

Pontificia Univ Javeriana, Dept Civil Engn, Carrera 7 40-62, Bogota 110231, Colombia - Author
Univ Escuela Colombiana Ingn, Ctr Study Struct Mat & Construct, Autopista Norte AK 45 205-59, Bogota 111321, Colombia - Author
Univ Los Andes, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Carrera 1 18A-12, Bogota 111711, Colombia - Author
Univ Politecn Madrid, Dept Continuum Mech & Struct, Madrid 28040, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

This study investigates the scale effects on the experimental shear strength of earthen walls, a critical parameter influencing the seismic performance of adobe and rammed-earth (RE) buildings. Recognized for their historical significance and sustainable construction practices, earthen structures require a comprehensive understanding of their mechanical behavior under shear loads to ensure effective design and preservation. This research compiles data from over 120 in-plane shear wall tests (adobe and RE), nearly 20 direct shear tests from the scientific and technical literature, and new cyclic direct shear tests performed on large cubic specimens (300 mm side length) made from the same material as a previously tested two-story RE wall. Based on the findings, this study recommends a minimum specimen cross-sectional area of 0.5 m(2) for reliable shear strength testing of earthen walls in structural laboratories. This recommendation aims to prevent the unconservative overestimation of shear strength commonly observed in smaller specimens, including direct shear tests. Furthermore, the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion outlined in the AIS-610 Colombian standard is validated as a conservative lower bound for all compiled shear strength data. Cyclic direct shear tests on nine 300 mm cubic specimens produced a Mohr-Coulomb envelope with an apparent cohesion of 0.0715 MPa and a slope of 0.66, whereas the full-scale two-story wall (5.95 x 6.20 x 0.65 m) constructed with the same material exhibited a much lower cohesion of 0.0139 MPa and a slope of 0.26. The analysis reveals significant scale effects, as small-scale specimens consistently overestimate shear strength due to their inability to capture macro-structural behaviors such as compaction layer interactions, construction joint weaknesses, and stress redistributions. Based on the analysis of the compiled data, the novelty of this study lies in defining a strength reduction factor for direct shear tests (3.4-3.8 for rammed earth, similar to 3.0 for adobe) to align with full-scale wall behavior, as well as establishing a minimum specimen size (>= 0.5 m(2)) for reliable in-plane shear testing of earthen walls, ensuring accurate structural assessments of shear strength. This study provides a first approach to the shear behavior of unstabilized earth. To expand its application, future research should explore how the scale of specimens with different stabilizers affects their shear strength.
[+]

Keywords

Adobe wallAdobe wallsConcrete mixturesDirect shear testDirect shear testsDynamic responseFracture mechanicsHydroelasticityIn-plane loadsMortarPerformancePseudostaticRammed earthRammed earth wallsRammed-earth wallsRetaining wallsScale effectsSeismic behaviorSeismic designShear flowShear strengthShear stressShear testsShear wallsShearing machinesShears strengthSimulatioStatic and pseudo-static in-plane load shear testStatic and pseudo-static in-plane load shear testsStrain rateWell testing

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Buildings due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2025, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Architecture. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2026-04-02:

  • WoS: 3
  • Scopus: 3
[+]

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2026-04-02:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 23.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 23 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1.

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: https://oa.upm.es/94802/

As a result of the publication of the work in the institutional repository, statistical usage data has been obtained that reflects its impact. In terms of dissemination, we can state that, as of

  • Views: 34
  • Downloads: 15
[+]

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Colombia.

[+]

Awards linked to the item

This project was conducted in a collaborative research effort between Pontificia Universidad Javeriana and Universidad de los Andes, Colombia. The research was funded by Pontificia Universidad Javeriana through Project ID 00008950. Also, this study was funded by MinCiencias (Colombia) through Patrimonio Autonomo Fondo Nacional de Financiamiento para la Ciencia, la Tecnologia y la Innovacion Francisco Jose de Caldas, grant number 120385269649 MGI, proposal Id: 6988, in accordance with 852-2019, and contract 80740-510-2020. The title of the project was Rehabilitacion sismica de edificaciones en tierra (patrimoniales) de dos niveles.
[+]