{rfName}
Ab

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Citations

5

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Burgos Vargas CCorresponding AuthorMora Alonso-Muñoyerro S.Author

Share

Publications
>
Article

About the validity of Alois Riegl’s The Modern Cult of Monuments

Publicated to:Journal Of Architectural Conservation. 28 (3): 183-196 - 2022-01-01 28(3), DOI: 10.1080/13556207.2022.2045807

Authors: Burgos Vargas C; Mora Alonso-Muñoyerro S

Affiliations

Abstract

The extensive literature about heritage values makes it difficult to find a typology that can be used as a standard tool for value assessment. Instead of proposing a new typology, this article takes a step back to examine the value typology defined by Alois Riegl in The Modern Cult of Monuments. Its Character and its Origin (1903) and, analysing it along with a sample of other typologies, to find out if it is still useful today and how it can be adapted to the changes in Heritage Conservation in Europe during the circa 120 years since its creation. The result is an updated value typology that could be applied to historical and recent heritage.

Keywords

alois rieglconservationconservation principlescultural significancevalue assessmentvalue typologiesAlois rieglConservation principles‌Cultural significanceHeritageValue assessmentValue typologiesValues

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Journal Of Architectural Conservation due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2022, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Conservation.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 3.75, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-03, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 1
  • Scopus: 3
  • Google Scholar: 1
  • OpenCitations: 3

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-03:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 12 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Italy.

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (BURGOS VARGAS, CAMILA) and Last Author (MORA ALONSO-MUÑOYERRO, SUSANA).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been BURGOS VARGAS, CAMILA.